75. Alatas C, Aksoy E, Akarsu C, et al. Evaluation of intrauterine abnormalities in infertile patient by sonohysterography. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 487-90
76. Reis MM, Soras SR, Cancoda ML, et al. Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography withSHU 454(Echovist) for the assesement of tubal patency. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 3049-52
77. Jones HW, Wheeless CR. Salvage of the reproductive potencial of women with anomalies development of the mullerian ducts: Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 104: 348
78. Tompkins P. Comments on the bicornuate uterus and twinnig Surg Clin North Am 1962; 42: 1049
79. Hassa H, embryologic development of the uterus and its congenital anomaliesTurkiye Klinikleri J Surg Med Sci 2007;3(40):1-7
80. Jurkovic D, Gruboeck K, Tailor N, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasound screening for congenital uterine anomalies. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 104: 1320-1
81. Nahum GG. Uterine anomalies. How common are they and what is their distribution among subtypes? J Reprod Med 1998; 43: 877-87
82. Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reproductive Updata 2001; 7: 161-74
83. Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Pellicer A. Reproductive impact of congenital müllerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 1997;12: 2277-81
84. Makino T, Hara T, Oka C, et al. Survey of 1120 Japanese women with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992;44: 123-130
85. Kovacevic M, Lusic N, Vukic R. Congenital uterine anomalies in pregnancy. Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol 1990;30: 117-9
86. Ashton D, Amin HK, Richart RM, Neuwirth RS. The incidence of asympyomatic uterine anomalies in women undergoing transcervical tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72: 28-30
87. Simon C, Martinez L, Pardo F, Tortajada M, Pellicer A. Müllerian defects in women with normal reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 1991;56: 1192-3



77. SAYFAYA BENZER SAYFALAR

Uterin Septum'lu olgularda histeroskopik septum insizyonu sonrası gebelik sonuçları - Sayfa 54
15. Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J. Reproductive impact of congenital mullerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 1997; 12:2277-2281. 16. Propst AM, Hill JA. 3rd. Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med 2000; 18:341 -350. 17. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnanc...
Histeroskopik endometriyal polip eksizyonunun endmoetriyal reseptivite markerları olan hoxa 10, hoxa 11 ve lif gen ekspresyonu üzerine etkisi - Sayfa 110
214.Simón C, Martinez L, Pardo F, Tortajada M, Pellicer A. Müllerian defects inwomen with normal reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril. 1991 Dec;56(6):1192-3.PubMed PMID: 1743344. 215. Acién P. Reproductive performance of women with uterine malformations. HumReprod. 1993 Jan;8(1):122-6. PubMed PMID: 8458914. 216.Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Pellicer A. Reproductive impac...
Uterin Septum'lu olgularda histeroskopik septum insizyonu sonrası gebelik sonuçları - Sayfa 53
KAYNAKLAR 1. Heinonen PK, Saarikoski S, Pystynen P. Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 61:157-162. 2. Acien P. Reproductive performance of women with uterine malformations. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 122-6. 3. Raga F, Bauset C, Pellicer A. Reproductive impact of congenital müllerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 1993; 12:2277-81. 4. Rock JA, Jones HW Jr....

77. SAYFADAKI ANAHTAR KELIMELER

steril
fertil
obstet
with
reproductive
reprod


77. SAYFA ICERIGI

75. Alatas C, Aksoy E, Akarsu C, et al. Evaluation of intrauterine abnormalities in infertile patient by sonohysterography. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 487-90
76. Reis MM, Soras SR, Cancoda ML, et al. Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography withSHU 454(Echovist) for the assesement of tubal patency. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 3049-52
77. Jones HW, Wheeless CR. Salvage of the reproductive potencial of women with anomalies development of the mullerian ducts: Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 104: 348
78. Tompkins P. Comments on the bicornuate uterus and twinnig Surg Clin North Am 1962; 42: 1049
79. Hassa H, embryologic development of the uterus and its congenital anomaliesTurkiye Klinikleri J Surg Med Sci 2007;3(40):1-7
80. Jurkovic D, Gruboeck K, Tailor N, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasound screening for congenital uterine anomalies. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 104: 1320-1
81. Nahum GG. Uterine anomalies. How common are they and what is their distribution among subtypes? J Reprod Med 1998; 43: 877-87
82. Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reproductive Updata 2001; 7: 161-74
83. Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Pellicer A. Reproductive impact of congenital müllerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 1997;12: 2277-81
84. Makino T, Hara T, Oka C, et al. Survey of 1120 Japanese women with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992;44: 123-130
85. Kovacevic M, Lusic N, Vukic R. Congenital uterine anomalies in pregnancy. Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol 1990;30: 117-9
86. Ashton D, Amin HK, Richart RM, Neuwirth RS. The incidence of asympyomatic uterine anomalies in women undergoing transcervical tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72: 28-30
87. Simon C, Martinez L, Pardo F, Tortajada M, Pellicer A. Müllerian defects in women with normal reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 1991;56: 1192-3

İlgili Kaynaklar







single.php