88. Zanetti E, Ferrari LR, Rossi G. Classification and radiographic features of uterine malformations: hysterosalpingographyic study. Br J Radiol 1978; 51: 161-70
89. Braun P, Grau FV, Pons RM, Enguix DP. Is hysterosalpingography able to diagnose all uterine malformations correctly? A retrospective study E Journal of Radiology 2005; 53: 274-9
90. Rock JA, Jones HW. The clinical management of the double uterus. Fertil Steril 1977; 28.
91. Rabinowitz R, Laufer N, Lewin A, et al. The value of ultrasonographic endometrial measurement in the prediction of pregnancy following IVF. Fertil Steril 1986;45: 824
92. Ferrozzi E, Terri V, Trio D et al. Sonographic endometrial thickness: A useful test to predict atrophy in patients with postmenopausal bleeding. An Italian multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;315:315-321.
93. Goldstein SR, Nachtigall et al. Endometrial assesment by vaginal ultrasonography before endometrial sampling in patient with postmenopausal bleeding. AMJ Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:119-121.
94. Fleischer A, Wheeter J, Kravitz B, et al. Sonographic screening for endometrial disease in postmenopausal women: Assesment of positive and negative predictive values. Presented at AUM. 1999.
95. Weiger M, Frieser K, Strittmatter HJ, et al. Measuring the thickness: s that al we have to do for sonographic assesment of endometrium in postmenopausal women? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 6: 97-102.
96. Fleischer A, Vasquez J, Batzer F. Sonohysterography and sonosalpingography with hysteroscopic correlations; Edumed, 1998Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Sampaio M, Pellicer A. An assesment of hysterosalpingosonography as a diagnostic tool for uterine cavity defects and tubal patency. J Clin Ultrasound. 1992; 20: 175-181.
97. Syrop C, Sahakian V. Transvaginal sonographic detection of endometrial polips with fluid contrast augmentation. Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 79: 1041-1043.



78. SAYFAYA BENZER SAYFALAR

Histeroskopinin anormal uterin kanama değerlendirmesindeki yeri - Sayfa 71
61 41. Hunter RE, Reuter K, Kopin E (1989). Use of ultrasonography in the difficult postmenopausal dilatition and curetage. Obstet Gynecol May;73(5Pt 1):813-6. 42. Sardo AD, Sharma M, Taylor A (2004). A new device for ‘no touch’ biopsi at ‘no touch’ hysteroscopy: the H pipelle.Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jul;191(1):157-8. 43. Stovall TG, Photopulos GJ, Poston WM, ve ark. (1991). Pipelle endometrial sa...
Endometriyum kanseri ve selim endometriyal patolojilerde 3 boyutlu power doppler parametreleri ve serum insan epididimis proteini 4 seviyelerinin incelenmesi - Sayfa 39
21- Wolfman W, Leyland N, Heywood M, Singh SS, Rittenberg DA, Soucy R, Allaire C, Awadalla A, Best C, Dunn S, Leroux N, Potestio F, Senikas V, Wallace S,Menzies R, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Asymptomatic endometrial thickening. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010; 32: 990-9. 22-Goldstein SR. Modern evaluation of the endometrium. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116: 168-76. 23- van Doorn...
Endometriyum kanseri ve selim endometriyal patolojilerde 3 boyutlu power doppler parametreleri ve serum insan epididimis proteini 4 seviyelerinin incelenmesi - Sayfa 37
7. KAYNAKLAR 1-Greenlee RT, Murray T Bolden S, Wingo PA Cancer statistics. Cancer J Clin 2000; 50: 7-33 2-Sorosky JI. Endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 436-47. 3-Spencer CP, Whitehead MI. Endometrial assessment re-visited. Br J Obs et Gynaecol 1999; 106: 623–632. 4-Ferrazzi E, Torri V, Trio D, Zannoni E, Filiberto S, Dordoni D. Sonographic endometrial thickness: a useful test to pr...

78. SAYFADAKI ANAHTAR KELIMELER

ultrasound
obstet
gynecol
postmenopausal
bleeding
with


78. SAYFA ICERIGI

88. Zanetti E, Ferrari LR, Rossi G. Classification and radiographic features of uterine malformations: hysterosalpingographyic study. Br J Radiol 1978; 51: 161-70
89. Braun P, Grau FV, Pons RM, Enguix DP. Is hysterosalpingography able to diagnose all uterine malformations correctly? A retrospective study E Journal of Radiology 2005; 53: 274-9
90. Rock JA, Jones HW. The clinical management of the double uterus. Fertil Steril 1977; 28.
91. Rabinowitz R, Laufer N, Lewin A, et al. The value of ultrasonographic endometrial measurement in the prediction of pregnancy following IVF. Fertil Steril 1986;45: 824
92. Ferrozzi E, Terri V, Trio D et al. Sonographic endometrial thickness: A useful test to predict atrophy in patients with postmenopausal bleeding. An Italian multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;315:315-321.
93. Goldstein SR, Nachtigall et al. Endometrial assesment by vaginal ultrasonography before endometrial sampling in patient with postmenopausal bleeding. AMJ Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:119-121.
94. Fleischer A, Wheeter J, Kravitz B, et al. Sonographic screening for endometrial disease in postmenopausal women: Assesment of positive and negative predictive values. Presented at AUM. 1999.
95. Weiger M, Frieser K, Strittmatter HJ, et al. Measuring the thickness: s that al we have to do for sonographic assesment of endometrium in postmenopausal women? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 6: 97-102.
96. Fleischer A, Vasquez J, Batzer F. Sonohysterography and sonosalpingography with hysteroscopic correlations; Edumed, 1998Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Sampaio M, Pellicer A. An assesment of hysterosalpingosonography as a diagnostic tool for uterine cavity defects and tubal patency. J Clin Ultrasound. 1992; 20: 175-181.
97. Syrop C, Sahakian V. Transvaginal sonographic detection of endometrial polips with fluid contrast augmentation. Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 79: 1041-1043.

İlgili Kaynaklar







single.php